The Supreme Court held that reserve category candidates who score above the cut-off mark for open category candidates cannot be denied equality of treatment merely on account of their caste or community. The Rajasthan High Court had advertised 2756 vacancies for Junior Judicial Assistants, involving a written test followed by a typewriting test. Several reserved […]
We Practice
FIXED PRICE SERVICES
- Trade Mark registration
- Agreement/ document Review
- Drafting petition/ writ / PIL/affidavit /written Submissions / Statement on Oath / Agreement / Deeds /MOUS
- Appearances before Tribunals, High Court, Supreme Court, AO, CIT(A), District and sessions court
- Company Incorporation
Today's Study
February 16, 2026
Yesterday's Study
Distinction between “Deficiency in Service” and “Medical Negligence”
February 12, 2026
The Supreme Court held that the benchmark for adjudging medical negligence is the lowest standard of professional skill and competence expected of a medical practitioner. It clarified that “deficiency in service” in patient care is distinct from “medical negligence” and that the two concepts must not be enmeshed. The case involved an appellant who alleged […]
Interesting Webinars
Latest Updates
-
BAIL APPLN.-3713/2024 Parties: MOHD FARUQ @ RAJU vs STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Judge(s): JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAThe Delhi High Court granted regular bail to Mohd Faruq @ Raju in FIR No. 185/2016 under Sections 302/201/411/34 IPC, holding that eight years of incarceration without concluded prosecution evidence rendered further detention unjustified. The decisive ground was the fragile circumstantial chain
-
BAIL APPLN.-3806/2024 Parties: SANTOSH KUMAR THROUGH BROTHER PAROKAR AKASH KUMAR vs THE STATE N.C.T. OF DELHIThe Delhi High Court granted regular bail to Santosh Kumar under Sections 437/439 CrPC, holding that the prosecution’s circumstantial chain, built around Sections 302/201/34 IPC, had snapped at every link. The decisive ground was the irreconcilable evidentiary gaps: CCTV footage produced under the 2025 status report showed only two unidentifiable backs and a TSR whose number and lane were indiscernible, rendering the IO’s claim of recognition by witnesses legally worthless
-
Crl.A. No.-000885-000885 - 2026 Parties: BALMUKUND SINGH GAUTAM vs STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHThe Supreme Court set aside the High Court’s order granting anticipatory bail to Respondent No.2 under Section 438 CrPC, holding that an absconder who evaded investigation for six years cannot claim this discretionary relief merely because co-accused were acquitted
-
You are an Advocate, are you expected to write this Type of Language?': SC slams Advocate for derogatory Post against Rape complainantThe Supreme Court declined to entertain a writ petition filed by a woman advocate seeking protection from arrest over a Facebook post targeting a rape complainant in a case involving a Kerala legislator, sharply criticising the language used and underscoring the professional responsibility of lawyers, particularly when commenting on sensitive criminal allegations.
-
Bizarre: Rs. 2 Crore Compensation for a bad Haircut, SC reduces it to Rs.25 Lakh, Read JudgmentRecently, the Supreme Court set aside a Rs.2 crore compensation awarded by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) against ITC Limited in a consumer dispute arising out of a haircut at a luxury hotel salon, holding that while deficiency in service stood established, compensation cannot be granted in crores without reliable and admissible proof of actual loss. In a significant reaffirmation of evidentiary discipline in consumer jurisprudence, the Court cautioned that damages cannot be awarded “on the mere asking.”
Chambers At:
Delhi Chamber
Chamber No 3A, Old Lawyers Chamber Block,
Patiala House Court Complex,
New Delhi 110001
Gurgaon Chamber
Block A1, H. No 68, lower Ground Floor,
Sushant Lok II,
Golf Course Road, Gurgaon 122011
Landline 0124-4061227